THEORETICAL REVIEW OF THE INTEGRATIVE MODEL: DEVELOPMENT OF A LITERACY LEARNING MODEL BASED ON COGNITIVE STRATEGY MAPPING

Authors

Keywords:

Reading Literacy, Cognitive Strategies, Integrative Model, Strategy Mapping, Literacy Instruction

Abstract

This study is motivated by the importance of literacy as a fundamental skill in learning and the role of effective cognitive strategies in enhancing students’ reading abilities and comprehension. Literacy is not merely the ability to read, but also involves complex cognitive processes that can be supported through the application of appropriate cognitive strategies. Therefore, this study aims to examine integrative theories in order to develop a literacy learning model based on Cognitive Strategy Mapping, which is expected to provide a systematic and structured approach to literacy instruction. The research method employed is a theoretical study using a critical literature review of various theories and models of literacy learning, along with a comprehensive analysis of the concept of Cognitive Strategy Mapping. The main findings of this study identify key components of an integrative literacy learning model that incorporates cognitive strategy mapping as a tool to facilitate students’ processes of understanding and organizing information. The implications of this study recommend the model as a conceptual framework that can be used in curriculum development and in designing more effective and targeted literacy learning strategies across different educational levels

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arrosyad, M. I., & Nugroho, F. (2021). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Membaca dan Numerasi di Tengah Evolusi Konsep Literasi. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 6378–6384.

Baha, D. O. A. (2017). Reading Models: A Review of the Current Literature. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 2(3), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.24001/ijels.2.3.6

Banditvilai, C. (2020). The Effectiveness of Reading Strategies on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.V10.1012

Barak, M., & Levenberg, A. (2016). A Model of Flexible Thinking in Contemporary Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.003

Birriy, A. F., Indahwati, N., & Nurhasan, N. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Adaptif Permainan Bocce Berbasis PBL Bagi Down Syndrome untuk Mengajarkan Keterampilan Motorik dan Berinteraksi Sosial. JOSSAE (Journal of Sport Science and Education), 5(2), 94–103.

Cahyani, N., Hutagalung, E. N. H., & Harahap, S. H. (2024). Berpikir Kritis Melalui Membaca: Pentingnya Literasi Dalam Era Digital. IJEDR: Indonesian Journal of Education and Development Research, 2(1), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijedr.v2i1.1795

Chalaune, B. S. (2021). Paulo Freire’s Critical Pedagogy in Educational Transformation. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(4), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i4.2021.3813

DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching Students to Think Spatially Through Embodied Actions: Design Principles for Learning Environments in Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0039-y

Eppler, M. J. (2006). A Comparison between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131

Eslit, E. (2023). 21st Century Teaching: Updates, Challenges, and Best Practices. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21864.65284

Faridah, S., Saputra, R. I., & Ramadhani, M. I. (2023). Strategi Guru dalam Meningkatkan Minat Membaca Siswa SD Negeri 2 Tambang Ulang. Jurnal Terapung: Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 5(2), 60–69.

Hanipah, S. (2023). Analisis Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dalam Memfasilitasi Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 pada Siswa Menengah Atas. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 264–275.

Harsiati, T. (2018). Karakteristik Soal Literasi Membaca pada Program PISA. LITERA, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i1.19048

Harto, K., & Hawa, K. (2025). Refleksi Hasil PISA Dan TIMSS di Indonesia: Upaya Peningkatan Kompetensi Literasi Siswa Madrasah Melalui AKMI. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(02), 391–405.

Hidayat, F., & Muhamad, N. (2021). Model Addie (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation) Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Addie (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation) Model in Islamic Education Learning. J. Inov. Pendidik. Agama Islam, 1(1), 28–37.

Hussein, A. (2024). Innovative Teaching Methods Enhancing Engagement and Learning Outcomes.

Khoiri, M., Suyono, S., & Harsiati, T. (2025). Unlocking Minds: The Nexus of Reading Literacy and Cognitive Strategies in Educational Advancement. College & Research Library News, 86(04). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.86.4.157

Lestari, W., Selvia, F., & Layliyyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan Open-Ended terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa. At-Ta’lim: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 184–197.

Li, S., & Lajoie, S. P. (2022). Cognitive engagement in Self-Regulated Learning: An Integrative Model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(3), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00565-x

Marhaeni, A. (2016). Rosenblatt’s Transactional Theory and Its Implementation in the Teaching of Integrated Reading. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v5i4.1052

Marmet, M. D. (2023). Bridging the power gap: the impact of pedagogical strategies and relationship-building on student success. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2023-0009

Muhidin, A., & Doriza, S. (2024). Belajar Membelajarkan Siswa: Praktik Baik Pembelajaran Mendalam, Bermakna, dan Gembira.

Pambudi, M. A. (2022). Strategi Guru dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Digital pada Siswa. Jurnal Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(03), 636–646.

Papen, U. (2023). The (New) Literacy Studies: The Evolving Concept of Literacy as Social Practice and Its Relevance for Work with Deaf Students. Cultura & Psyché, 4(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43638-023-00067-1

Pontjowulan, P. (2025). Revitalisasi Literasi Membaca dan Menulis sebagai Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMK Menghadapi Tantangan Abad 21. Educationist: Journal of Educational and Cultural Studies, 3(3), 222–231.

Putnam, A. L. (2015). Mnemonics in Education: Current Research and Applications. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000023

Putrayasa, I. M., Suwindia, I. G., & Ari Winangun, I. M. (2024). Transformasi Literasi di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang untuk Generasi Muda. Education and Social Sciences Review, 5(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.29210/07essr501400

Rejeki, S. K., & Pangesti, I. (2024). Pelatihan Guru SMP untuk Penguatan Literasi dan Numerasi Pondok Pesantren Modern Daar El Nayl Kecamatan Sukaraja Bogor. Jurnal Akselerasi Merdeka Belajar Dalam Pengabdian Orientasi Masyarakat (AMPOEN): Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 41–47.

Ritchhart, R., & Church, M. (2020). The Power of Making Thinking Visible: Practices to Engage and Empower All Learners. Wiley.

Rivero Galeano, R., Gómez Salgado, A., & Lorduy Arellano, D. (2020). Metacognitive Strategies and Learning Quality: A Systematic Mapping Study. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technologies 2020, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.33965/icedutech2020_202002L007

Safarudin, R., Zulfamanna, Z., Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 9680–9694.

Suppawittaya, P., & Yasri, P. (2021). The Comparison of Chunking Methods to Enhance the Cognitive Capacity of Short-term Memory to Retain Textual Information among High School Students. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v3i1.502

Suraprajit, P. (2019). Bottom-up vs Top-down Model: The Perception of Reading Strategies among Thai University Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 454. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1003.07

Susanti, D. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Tipe Poe (Prediction, Observation, and Explanation) terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Ditinjau dari Aktivitas Belajar Peserta Didik. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Utami, P. R., Rahmawati, L., & Noktaria, M. (2025). Pengembangan Kompetensi dan Soft Skill dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka: Tinjauan Literatur. MANAJERIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 5(1), 55–65.

van Kesteren, M. T. R., Krabbendam, L., & Meeter, M. (2018). Integrating educational knowledge: reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration. Npj Science of Learning, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0027-8

Winn, A. A. S., DelSignore, L., Marcus, C., Chiel, L., Freiman, E., Stafford, D., & Newman, L. (2019). Applying Cognitive Learning Strategies to Enhance Learning and Retention in Clinical Teaching Settings. MedEdPORTAL, 15, 10850. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10850

Yasri, P., Suppawittaya, P., & Pratchayapong Yasri, P. S. (2021). The Effectiveness of Chunking Methods for Enhancing Short-Term Memory of Textual Information. Psychology and Education Journal, 57(9), 6313–6327. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v57i9.2963

Zhao, Q. (2024). The Application of Cognitive Strategies in University English Reading Instruction. Applied & Educational Psychology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.23977/appep.2024.050207

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

THEORETICAL REVIEW OF THE INTEGRATIVE MODEL: DEVELOPMENT OF A LITERACY LEARNING MODEL BASED ON COGNITIVE STRATEGY MAPPING. (2025). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 315-328. https://jurnal-jams.or.id/index.php/JAMS/article/view/47

Similar Articles

1-10 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.