THE ROLE OF THE REGIONAL INSPECTORATE AS AN APPARATUS GOVERNMENT INTERNAL SUPERVISION (APIP)
Keywords:
Government Internal Supervision Apparatus, Legal System, General Principles of Good GovernmentAbstract
The Regional Inspectorate acts as the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) that oversees the implementation of local government through audit, review, evaluation, and monitoring functions, and has transformed into a strategic partner (trusted advisor) and quality assurance (quality assurance). This study aims to analyze the role of the Regional Inspectorate as APIP of Metro City and the factors that hinder the implementation of its duties by using normative and empirical juridical approaches through primary and secondary data analyzed in a qualitative juridical manner. The results of the study show that juridically, the role of the Metro City Regional Inspectorate already has a legal basis through the Metro Mayor Regulation Number 24 of 2025, but its implementation has not been optimal due to the limitations of functional auditors, the conflict of hierarchical control through the Regional Secretary, budget limitations, the absence of regulations on the protection of auditors' careers, the low transparency of supervisory report results, and the lack of compliance of regional apparatus organizations with the recommendations of the results audit. Therefore, institutional strengthening is needed through the repositioning of the Inspectorate's accountability path to the Mayor, the addition of functional auditors, the increase in the supervision budget, the establishment of regulations for the protection of the auditor profession, and the increase in transparency of supervisory results in order to realize more effective local government accountability.
Downloads
References
Fauzi, A. (2019). Otonomi daerah dalam kerangka mewujudkan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah yang baik. Spektrum Hukum, 16(1), 119–136.
Iskandar, D., W.N, Z., Almanda, A., Abdinur, I., Putra, D. Y., Andriani, C. Y., & Zulhazrul, Z. (2024). Perkembangan Teori dan Penerapan Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.147
J. Riwu Kaho. (2004). Analisa Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah. Bina Aksara.
Jainah, Z. O., Lintje, A. M., Erlina, B., & Sumbawaningrum, H. R. (2020). Exploring regional potential to strengthen income in the framework of welfare community. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(Extra 7), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4009676
Masyar, A. (2009). Gaya Indonesia Menghadang Terorisme: Sebuah Kritik Atas Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia. Mandar Maju.
Rizky Reza Pahlevi, Zulfi Diane Zaini, & Recca Ayu Hapsari. (2021). Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 5(1).
Susiana, S. (2018). Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penyelenggaraan Kesehatan Reproduksi (Studi di Provinsi Jawa Tengah dan Provinsi Kalimantan Barat). Jurnal Aspirasi, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22212/aspirasi.v7i1.1084
Thontowi, J., Wati, E., Jamil, A., & Nurjihad, N. (2024). Transformation of Pancasila and the Rule of Law: A Comparative Study and Analysis of National Development Before and After Government Reformation. SHS Web of Conferences, 204, 07011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420407011
Wijayanti, S. N. (2016). Hubungan antara pusat dan daerah dalam negara kesatuan Republik Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Media Hukum, 23(2), 186–199.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M FADHIL ARIFIN, KINANTI SURYANI, RIZA ARVIANSYAH, LUSI ANTIKA, ERINA PANE (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
