ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF PERPETRATORS OF SEVERE PERSECUTION WITH PERMANENT DISABILITY (Study of Decision Number 38/Pid.B/2026/PN Tjk)
Keywords:
criminal liability, severe persecution, permanent disability, judge's consideration.Abstract
The crime of severe persecution that results in permanent disability is a crime against the body that causes physical and psychological suffering to the victim and requires strict criminal accountability. This study aims to analyze the factors that cause perpetrators to commit severe persecution as a result of permanent disability and to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators in Decision Number 38/Pid.B/2026/PN Tjk. This research uses normative juridical approaches and empirical juridical approaches. Data were obtained through literature studies of laws and regulations, court decisions, and relevant literature, as well as field research through interviews with prosecutors, judges, and legal advisors. The results of the study showed that these criminal acts were influenced by emotional factors in the form of heartache, disappointment, and feelings of betrayal, which were strengthened by personal conflicts, low ability to control emotions, and low legal awareness. The criminal liability of the perpetrator is based on the fulfillment of the elements of the criminal act, the existence of intentionality, the ability to be responsible, and the absence of justification or forgiveness. The judge's decision to impose a prison sentence of 3 (three) years has been based on the facts of the trial, valid evidence, as well as juridical, philosophical, and sociological considerations. Thus, the verdict has reflected legal certainty, justice, and usefulness as the goal of criminal law enforcement.
Downloads
References
Agus, M. A., & Susanto, A. (2021). The Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(3), 369. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.369-384
Aristo, M. A., & Ma’ruf, U. (2020). Criminal Law Policy against Actor of Criminal Performance Persecution. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3(1), 139–146.
Awan Y. Abdoellah, & Yudi Rusfiana. (2016). Teori Dan Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Cv Alfabeta.
Donnely, J. (2020). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca and London Cornel University Press.
Fadlian, A. (2020). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM SUATU KERANGKA TEORITIS. Jurnal Hukum POSITUM, 5(2), 10–19.
Hartono, B., Aprinisa, A., & Mahendra, P. U. (2024). Implementasi Uang Pengganti Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor: 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Tjk). SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law, 1(2), 938–960. https://doi.org/10.57235/sakola.v1i2.3556
Huda, C. (2006). Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Kencana.
Kamalludin, I., Purwanti, A., Sularto, R. B., Arief, B. N., & Nunna, B. P. (2025). THE PARADOX OF IMPRISONMENT: NAVIGATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND PENAL POLICY IN INDONESIA’S NEW CRIMINAL CODE. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 13(2), 351–384.
Khairunnisa, P., & Rasji, R. (2024). Menilik Penjatuhan Sanksi Kumulatif Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan oleh Anak Yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Ditinjau dari Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(4), 990–1001. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v6i4.935
World Health Organization. (2022). Global analysis of healthcare waste in the context of COVID-19: status, impacts and recommendations.
Zainudin Hasan, Lukmanul Hakim, & Rudi Irawan. (2023). Judge’s Consideration in Imposing the Death Penalty on Perpetrators of Narcotic and Narcotic Precursor Crimes. Constitutional Law Society, 2(2), 125–134.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Fahmi Alfahidh, M. Dimas Bagaskoro, Bambang Hartono, Benny Karya Limantara (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
