THE ECOVADIS-BASED ON SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES FOR RAW MATERIAL SUPPLIERS SOURCING FROM RUBBER FARMERS

Authors

  • Bur samin Universitas Pat Petulai, Indonesia Author
  • Budi Prastia Muaro Bungo University, Indonesia Author
  • Hasnelly Hasnelly Muaro Bungo University, Indonesia Author
  • Tanti Novita Pat Petulai University, Indonesia Author
  • Lia Andiani Pat Petulai University, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

EcoVadis, Sustainability, Environment, Ethics, Labor & Human Rights, Sustainable Procurement. PT Bukit Angkasa Makmur

Abstract

This community service initiative aims to provide insight into and knowledge regarding the sustainability performance of PT Bukit Angkasa Makmur—spanning the entire value chain from rubber farmers to suppliers of raw rubber materials for the crumb rubber processing industry in Central Bengkulu—using the EcoVadis platform since 2023. Data were gathered from corporate policy documents, external audits, and sustainability reports, employing survey, observation, and presentation methods to convey analysis and evaluation techniques. PT Bukit Angkasa Makmur’s sustainability performance was assessed via an external approach utilizing the EcoVadis platform. EcoVadis provides a dynamic assessment of corporate sustainability performance across four key themes: Environment, Labor & Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement. The 2026 sustainability performance assessment is crucial for illustrating the company's commitment to sustainable business practices within the crumb rubber processing industry; the results are expected to provide a clear picture of the extent to which PT Bukit Angkasa Makmur adheres to global sustainability standards and how it performs in environmental, social, and ethical aspects. The assessment results indicate that PT Bukit Angkasa Makmur achieved at least a silver medal with an overall score of 68, placing it within the top 15% of companies based on robust policies regarding environmental practices, human rights, ethics, and sustainable procurement. Given the importance of understanding platforms like EcoVadis, the community service team assisted the company in communicating its sustainability performance to customers and other stakeholders

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, Sonakshi, Liu, Lisa Yao, Rajgopal, Shivaram, Sridharan, Suhas A., Yan, Yifan, & Yohn, Teri Lombardi. (2023). Esg Ratings Of Esg Index Providers. Columbia Business School Research Paper, (4468531).

Chen, Fei, Liu, Yue Hu, & Chen, Xue Zhao. (2024). Esg Performance And Business Risk—Empirical Evidence From China’s Listed Companies. Innovation And Green Development, 3(3), 100142.

Diez.C, Borja, Bishara, Tania, Otegi-Olaso, Jose Ramon, Minguez, Rikardo, & Fernández, José María. (2020). Measurement Of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review Of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings And Ratings. Sustainability, 12(5), 2153.

Dimson, Elroy, Marsh, Paul, & Staunton, Mike. (2021). Divergent Esg Ratings.

Ding, Kelly, Gamber, Angela, Jurcak, James, & Shook, Adrienne. (2021). Supply Chain Esg Compliance Strategy At Aptar.

Firmansyah, Amrie, Ak, M., Triastie, Gitty Ajeng, & Ak, S. Tr. (2021). Bagaimana Peran Tata Kelola Perusahaan Dalam Penghindaran Pajak, Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, Pengungkapan Risiko, Efisiensi Investasi? Penerbit Adab.

Gatzert, Nadine, & Martin, Michael. (2025). Determinants And Value Of Enterprise Risk Management: Empirical Evidence From The Literature. Risk Management And Insurance Review, 18(1), 29–53.

Gustian, Vena, & Faisal, Faisal. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Penggunaan Gri Indeks Dan Isr Indeks Dalam Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Perbankan Indonesia. Fakultas Ekonomika Dan Bisnis.

Harmoni, Ati. (2024). Stakeholder-Based Analysis Of Sustainability Report: A Case Study On Mining Companies In Indonesia. International Conference On Eurasian Economies, 40, 204–210.

Hopkins, Michael. (2021). Measurement Of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal Of Management And Decision Making, 6(3–4), 213–231.

Hörisch, Jacob, Freeman, R. Edward, & Schaltegger, Stefan. (2025). Applying Stakeholder Theory In Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, And A Conceptual Framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346.

Horvey, Sylvester Senyo, & Ankamah, Jacob. (2020). Enterprise Risk Management And Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence From Ghana Equity Market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1840102.

Iskandar, Irwan. (2024). Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Dan Kinerja Keuangan: Tinjauan Meta-Analisis. Tugas Mahasiswa Ekonomi, 1(1).

Kulova, Ivelina, & Nikolova-Alexieva, Valentina. (2023). Esg Strategy: Pivotal In Cultivating Stakeholder Trust And Ensuring Customer Loyalty. E3s Web Of Conferences, 462, 3035. Edp Sciences.

Setiatin, Tuti. (2021). Hubungan Antara Tanggungjawab Sosial Perusahaan Dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan: Pendekatan Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Ekonomak, 7(3), 49–56.

Sturm, Sebastian, Hohenstein, Nils Ole, Birkel, Hendrik, Kaiser, Gernot, & Hartmann, Evi. (2022). Empirical Research On The Relationships Between Demand-And Supply-Side Risk Management Practices And Their Impact On Business Performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(6), 742–761.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

How to Cite

THE ECOVADIS-BASED ON SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES FOR RAW MATERIAL SUPPLIERS SOURCING FROM RUBBER FARMERS. (2025). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 155-169. https://jurnal-jams.or.id/index.php/JAMS/article/view/217

Similar Articles

11-20 of 85

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.