IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GRANTING OF PAROLE AND PAROLE RIGHTS TO EFFECTIVENESS IN REDUCING OVERCAPACITY CONDITIONS IN BANDAR LAMPUNG CLASS I DETENTION CENTERS
Keywords:
Conditional Release, Conditional Leave, Prison Overcapacity, Correctional System, Social ReintegrationAbstract
Prison overcapacity remains a major challenge in Indonesia's correctional system, affecting the effectiveness of inmate rehabilitation and the fulfillment of prisoners' rights. Conditional Release and Conditional Leave are integration programs intended to facilitate the gradual reintegration of inmates into society while reducing prison overcrowding. This study aims to analyze the implementation of these integration rights in reducing overcapacity at Rutan Kelas I Bandar Lampung and to identify the obstacles encountered during their implementation. This research employed an empirical juridical approach using primary data collected through interviews and field observations, complemented by secondary data obtained from legislation, official documents, and relevant literature. The data were analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that the implementation of Conditional Release and Conditional Leave has generally complied with applicable legal provisions and contributed to reducing the inmate population. During 2025, 347 inmates received integration rights, consisting of 167 Conditional Releases and 180 Conditional Leaves. However, these programs have not fully resolved the overcapacity problem, as the detention center still accommodated 1,173 inmates despite having a capacity of only 750. Their implementation is constrained by administrative delays, incomplete documentation, limited human resources, heavy workloads, inter-agency coordination issues, and social stigma toward former inmates. The study concludes that Conditional Release and Conditional Leave are important policy instruments for supporting social reintegration and reducing prison overcrowding, but their effectiveness depends on stronger institutional coordination, improved administrative efficiency, adequate staffing, and greater community support.
Downloads
References
Abram, J. S. (2023). Penguatan kedudukan pemasyarakatan dalam sistem peradilan pidana terpadu melalui fungsi bimbingan kemasyarakatan. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), 4199–4214.
Agung Jaya, F., & Ketut Seregig, I. (2024). Pertanggujawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Memiliki Senjata Api Tanpa Izin (Studi Putusan No 607/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tjk), Farhan Agung Jaya Pertanggujawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Memiliki Senjata Api Tanpa Izin (Studi Putusan No 607/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tjk). In Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) (Vol. 5, Number 2).
Aulia, F. H. R., Siregar, F., Cahyanti, N. A., & Syarifuddin, S. (2026). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pembinaan Narapidana dan Peran Balai Pemasyarakatan dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan. JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK, 3(4), 731–745.
Hasibuan, U. V., Ediwarman, E., Marlina, M., & Trisna, W. (2024). Analisis Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Peran Lembaga Pemasyarakatan dalam Mengembalikan Kepercayaan Masyarakat untuk dapat Menerima Kembali Mantan Narapidana (Studi Kasus Lapas Kelas IIA Binjai). Jurnal Retentum, 6(1), 1–9.
Jaya, F. A., & Seregig, I. K. (2024). Pertanggujawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Memiliki Senjata Api Tanpa Izin (Studi Putusan No 607/Pid. Sus/2023/PN Tjk). Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ), 5(2).
Kusuma, F. P. (2013). Implikasi Hak-Hak Narapidana Dalam Upaya Pembinaan Narapidana Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 2(2).
Mufti, E. A., & Riyanto, O. S. (2023). Peran Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Upaya Rehabilitasi Narapidana Untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Residivis. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 2425–2438. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.4026
Nugroho, R. S. N., & Haerah, K. (2024). Fulfillment Of Prisoners’ Rights To Obtain Suitable Food According To Nutritional Needs Based On Law Number 22 Of 2022 Concerning. POLITICO, 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32528/politico.v24i1.2775
Rahmatullah, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, & Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. (2023). PENERAPAN PASAL 9 HURUF (D) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2022 TERKAIT HAK PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DAN MAKANAN YANG LAYAK DI LAPAS KELAS II B SINGARAJA. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 3(2).
Sultonudin, J. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Binaan Dalam Memperoleh Hak Atas Pemenuhan Makanan Yang Layak Dikaitkan Dengan Pengelolaan Keuangan (Studi Pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Cikarang). Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara, 11(1).
Supardi, S., Putri, H. A. A., & Suniaprily, F. G. A. (2026). A Legal Analysis of the Implementation of Law No. 22 of 2022 on Corrections. JIHK, 7(2), 1409–1423.
Wijayanto, D., Roestamy, M., & Suhartini, E. (2020). ASAS KEADILAN DALAM SUPLAI MAKAN TAHANAN KEPOLISIAN DAN LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009. JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v12i1.2526
Zainudin Hasan, Lukmanul Hakim, & Rudi Irawan. (2023). Judge’s Consideration in Imposing the
Death Penalty on Perpetrators of Narcotic and Narcotic Precursor Crimes. Constitutional Law Society, 2(2), 125–134.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aldo Prawira, Baharudin Baharudin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
