ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS WHEN IMPOSING PENALTIES ON PERPETRATORS OF CORRUPTION CRIMES WHERE RETURNING STATE FINANCIAL LOSSES
Keywords:
Judges' Considerations, Corruption Crimes, Refund of State Financial Losses, CriminalizationAbstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime that causes losses to state finances and hinders national development. The return of state financial losses by corrupt perpetrators is often used as one of the judges' considerations in imposing a crime, but the return does not remove the criminal liability of the perpetrator. The problem in this study is how the judge considers the crime against the perpetrators of corruption crimes with the return of state financial losses in Decision Number 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Tjk and the factors that cause the perpetrators to commit corruption crimes. This study uses normative and empirical juridical methods with a legislative approach and a case approach. Data was obtained through literature studies and interviews, then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show that the judge's consideration in the verdict is in accordance with the judge's theory of consideration according to Mackenzie because it considers the juridical aspects, the facts of the trial, the evidence, as well as the circumstances that aggravate and mitigate the defendant, including the return of state financial losses. The factors that cause corruption crimes are influenced by abuse of office, weak supervision, low moral integrity, and opportunities to obtain personal profits. Thus, the return of state losses is only a factor that mitigates the crime, not the criminal removal of the perpetrators of corruption.
Downloads
References
Ali, Z. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Aniditya, Y. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Undang-Undang No.2 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Da. 2019(2), 1–11.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. KMS Herman, S. H. M. H. M. S. (2026). PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DAN KODIFIKASI. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=cFW0EQAAQBAJ
Hartono, B. (2011). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pidana Ganti Kerugian (Denda) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Keadilan Progresif, (Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret), 1–14. http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/KP/article/view/73
Hartono, B., Aprinisa, A., & Mahendra, P. U. (2024). Implementasi Uang Pengganti Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor: 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Tjk). SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law, 1(2), 938–960. https://doi.org/10.57235/sakola.v1i2.3556
Hasan, Z. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Narkotika yang Dilakukan Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Way Huwi Provinsi Lampung. PRANATA HUKUM, 13(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v13i2.166
Munir, F. (2002). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Pendekatan Kontemporer. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Robert Enakesda, & Zainab Ompu Jainah. (2024). Reposisi Peran Justice Collaborator Dalam Upaya Memberantas Tindak Pidana Korupsi. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, (4).
Sholahudin, U. (2019). Pembangunan, Ketimpangan Sosial, Dan Kebutuhan Hukumnya: Menuju Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Al’Adalah, 20(2), 265–302. http://ejournal.iain-jember.ac.id/index.php/aladalah/article/view/744
Simanjuntak, T. E., Purba, H., & Aflah, A. (2024). Legal Certainty Of Guarantee Of Movable And Non-Movable Property In Oral Agreements To Lend Money. Jurnal Ekonomi, 13(04), 947–961.
Umanailo, M. C. B. (2013). Hukum dan perubahan sosial. Sosiologi Hukum, 4(1), 107–115.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhamad Zaki Mubaroh, Zainudin Hasan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
